Skip to content
Verellax
Sectors · tech · as at 14 September 2026 · live basis
Live specifications7,97263 employers · as at 14 September 2026
AI-central23.6%1,879 of 7,972 · live basis
No decision architecture61.9%1,164 of 1,879 AI-central
Execution load50.7%average share of the work a model absorbs first
The caveat that travels with every figure

Where a cell falls under 50 specifications the share is held and counts print beside shares. AI-central share moves with market mix; the market is named beside every share.

01

How many technology specifications mention AI

Of 7,972 live technology specifications from 63 employers as at 14 September 2026, 1,879 have AI core or supporting the work, 23.6%. The corpus average across 24,944 live specifications is 22.7%, the counterfactual for every sector figure on this page.

02

How technology compares across markets

Evidenced cells: Australia 735, United States 5,627, United Kingdom 540. The remaining 1,070 live specifications sit in the other eight markets and print once in the footer.

Technology across markets: AI-central share against no decision architecture
each base disclosed beneath the pair · directional at 35% · suppressed absent and named
Australia735 live · evidenced
held
held
United States5,627 live · evidenced
held
held
United Kingdom540 live · evidenced
held
held
AI-central shareNo decision architecture, of AI-central
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 7,972 Technology live specifications · other markets 1,070 · live basis · as at 14 September 2026
03

How AI reaches the entry level in technology

Entry and director-and-above cells print counts beside shares, and any cell under 50 is suppressed and stated. Both figures resolve from the sector block at build.

The pathway, across markets
AI-central share, entry level against director and above
Technology · cells under 50 print as counts · live basis
Entry level687 live
8.7%
Director and above395 live
35.2%
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 7,972 Technology live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026
04

How many technology AI roles define who overrules the model

Of 1,879 AI-central technology specifications, 1,164 say nothing about who can overrule the model, 61.9%.

Verbatim · one live AI-central specification · scores zero on the four tests

enable AI systems to resolve customer problems

Technology · Australia · September 2026 · scores zero on the four tests · company not inside a notice window
05

Which skills technology asks for

Layer shares are the average across the sector's live specifications of the share of each role's work in that layer. The top five sub-categories and the governance-to-tool-use ratio resolve from the sector block at build.

The four layers, defined
How the work divides across the layers
Technology · average share of each role's work · live basis
Execution
50.7%
Coordination
23.2%
Judgement
20.5%
AI-adjacent
5.6%

Top five sub-categories: internal orchestration, operational judgement, domain knowledge, functional craft, technical execution. Governance against tool use: 388 against 2,633.

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 7,972 Technology live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026
06

How this is measured

Live basis. Employers are never named against a figure; the verbatim is attributed to sector, market and month. A page publishes at 150 live specifications; a cell from 50 prints inside its parent with counts beside shares; under 50 it is suppressed and stated.

Full method at /method
Related pages
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 7,972 Technology live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026
Figures re-render each Monday from that week's pack. The Index re-answers the question each quarter.