Skip to content
Verellax

FRI 2 OCT · all markets · live specs · governed view · week ending 2 October 2026

Every figure carries four labels, or it does not publish.

Its population, its basis, its definition version, and its freeze. Verellax does not survey anyone. Every figure is read from what an organisation has already published and carries its date, and every projection names the measures it is built on.

Collected218,442every observation collected since 11 April 2026, reposts included · live specs · week ending 2 October 2026
Canonical83,159extracted and deduplicated, open or closed · live specs · week ending 2 October 2026
Live43,967canonical and still open at the freeze, from 283 employers · live specs · week ending 2 October 2026

A collected count is never coverage. The gap between collected and canonical is mostly reposts and roles outside the named markets, kept by design.

01 · WHAT WE MEASUREfour nouns · four instruments

Verellax measures the distance between what organisations say about AI and how they have designed the work around it.

The thesis has four nouns: AI is redistributing tasks faster than organisations are redesigning roles, decisions, and learning systems. Each noun has an instrument that reads it, and the first moves faster than the other three.

TasksCompositionWhat the work is made of, and how it moves as AI enters the role.
RolesThe three measuresWhether a role involves AI, whether AI sits at the centre of the work, and whether it is a new seat.
DecisionsThe four testsWhether the specification says how the person works with the model, who can overrule it, who is accountable, and which decisions stay with the person.
Learning systemsThe skills taxonomyWhat employers ask people to know and do. Published as the Skills Index.

A benchmark, not a standard: what good looks like is found in the distribution, as the minority that has designed the work furthest, and is never set in advance.

02 · THREE PUBLIC RECORDSread side by side · classified on the same keys

We read what organisations have already published, never a survey.

HOW THEY DESIGNED THE WORKJob specificationsThe only public account of how work is designed that an organisation writes itself, at scale, with a date on every line.
WHAT THEY SAYExecutive statementsResults, interviews, and keynotes, tiered by source. A social post is quoted as a person's words, never counted.
WHAT THEY INTENDCorporate signalsFilings, investments, partnerships, and restructuring, read beside the roles the company posts after them.

A record joins only when it is collected, classified, and floored across the sector.

03 · FROM COLLECTION TO FIGUREcollected daily · two bases, one label each

A figure names its base in the sentence that carries it.

From every observation collected to every figure published
Collected218,442
Canonical83,159
Live43,967

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 43,967 live specs · October 2026 · week ending 2 October 2026

Live specs

Open roles at the freeze. Every weekly figure on the site reads this base.

All collected specs, posting-date basis

Live and closed roles grouped by when they were posted. The Index edition reads this base, one quarter at a time.

Named markets clear 150 live roles, 10 employers, and 30 AI-central roles: Australia, the UK, the US, Ireland, Canada, and Singapore.

04 · THE SPINEthe three measures · each takes the measure before it as its base

Each role is read on whether it involves AI, whether AI sits at the centre of the work, and whether the role is accountable for what the model produces.

Live roles, on the three measures
Live roles43,967
Involved39.2% 17,241 of 43,967
Central61.2% 10,556 of 17,241

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 43,967 live specs · October 2026 · week ending 2 October 2026 · each share on the measure before it

The four tests, on 10,556 AI-central roles
Works with the model.18.7% 1,975
Can overrule it.9.5% 1,002
Is accountable for what it produces.21.8% 2,298
Keeps decisions over it.32.1% 3,388

7,144 (67.7%) meet none of the four. The four are reported one by one and never added into a score.

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 43,967 live specs · October 2026 · week ending 2 October 2026 · AI-central roles · governed view

Who the role is written for, of 17,241 live roles that involve AI
Uses AI56.5% 9,733
Builds it24.8% 4,281
Governs it4.3% 745
Not stated14.4% 2,482

For every live role written to govern AI, employers posted more than thirteen written to use it.

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 17,241 live roles that involve AI · all markets · live specs · week ending 2 October 2026

Beside the spine, the lenses.

Each role that involves AI is also read for its relationship to AI, whether it is a new seat or a backfill, where on the ladder AI lands, and how long it stays open. The findings come from crossing a measure with a lens, and every cross is named before it is read.

Every AI-central role is then read on four tests. Accountable is one of them. Roles that involve AI and AI-central roles are never interchanged, and the finding is always about the specification, never a claim that an organisation has no one accountable. US test figures are held while the live and frozen US counts disagree.

05 · HOW A FIGURE PUBLISHESthe register is the truth · a figure that is not a row does not publish

Every published figure is a row, computed once, and frozen before it reaches a page.

PUBLIC FLOORS · ON THE SMALLEST CELL
Under 30 rolesCounts only
30 to 149Share, with its count and base
150 and overShare39.2%

A sector publishes at 10 or more companies. A cell below its floor renders translucent with its count, never suppressed and never headlined.

Two freezes. The weekly freeze runs every Monday at 10:00 AEST and every page re-renders from it. The edition freeze is quarterly and pins one pack; the edition and its press pack render from that and nothing else.

Naming. Edition One names no employer. From Edition Two, a company is named only in the positive, above the floor, after fourteen days' notice. A company may always read its own figures; nobody else sees them.

Corrections. An error is corrected in public, as a dated note, with the query shown.

06 · WHAT THE METHOD CANNOT SAYthese limits apply to what is published

Documents, not practice. Absence from a specification is not absence from the organisation.

The method reads roles as written, not what happens after the hire. It makes no claim about workflows, workload, or automation from job specifications alone, and a stated skill is what an employer asks for, never what anyone holds. AI-central roles cluster in head offices, so geography partly measures where decisions are written. Trends wait for six months of continuous collection at stable coverage.

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 43,967 live specs · October 2026 · week ending 2 October 2026 · the method changes only by version: methodology v3.0