Skip to content
Verellax

Verellax Index · Edition One · Q3 2026 · roles advertised 1 July to 30 September 2026 · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

AI was involved in 36.9% of the roles advertised in Q3. When it sits at the centre of the work, only 20.4% of those specs say who is accountable for what it produces.

Verellax read the 57,134 job specifications that 284 employers advertised between 1 July and 30 September 2026, in seven named markets. Each role is read on whether it involves AI, whether AI sits at the centre of the work, and whether the role is accountable for what the model produces.

Each measure takes the one before it as its base.

Involved36.9%of roles advertised in Q3 involve AI21,084 of 57,134
Central60.0%of roles that involve AI have AI at the centre of the work12,648 of 21,084
Accountable20.4%of AI-central roles are accountable for what the model produces2,585 of 12,648

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 57,134 specifications advertised in Q3 · all markets · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze · coverage 39.3% of captured Q3 postings extracted · accountable reads the governed view

Every AI-central role is then read on four tests.

Works with the model.16.6%2,096 of 12,648 AI-central roles
Can overrule it.9.2%1,169 of 12,648 AI-central roles
Is accountable for what it produces.20.4%2,585 of 12,648 AI-central roles
Keeps decisions over it.22.9%2,896 of 12,648 AI-central roles

As context beside the tests, not a finding of its own: 70.9% of AI-central roles advertised in Q3 meet none of the four (8,966 of 12,648).

Of 12,648 AI-central roles advertised in Q3, all markets · each test on its own, never added into a score · governed view · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

US test figures print only if the live and frozen US counts agree at the freeze.

Three findings from Q3

  1. 01

    Almost four in five AI-central roles do not say who is accountable for what the model produces.

    79.6% of AI-central roles advertised in Q3 do not say who is accountable for what the model produces (10,063 of 12,648).

    Accountable, of AI-central roles · roles advertised in Q3 · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

    Of AI-central roles
    Do not say who is accountable79.6%
    Say who is accountable20.4%
  2. 02

    AI comes into most roles as a tool, inside work that stays the same.

    60.5% of roles advertised in Q3 that involve AI are for people who use AI (12,762 of 21,084).

    Relationship, of roles that involve AI · roles advertised in Q3 · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

    The role's relationship to AI · of roles that involve AI
    Uses AI60.5%
    Builds it21.7%
    Governs it4.5%
  3. 03

    The redesign reaches entry-level roles least, where people learn the work.

    15.6% of entry-level roles advertised in Q3 involve AI (1,186 of 7,591), against 36.9% of all roles.

    Involved × seniority · roles advertised in Q3 · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

    Involve AI · each on its own base
    All roles36.9%
    Entry level15.6%

01 · Roles

Employers hired people to use AI far more often than to build it or govern it.

The role's relationship to AI, read on the roles advertised in Q3 that involve AI.

Builds AI: models, agents, and the products, systems, and workflows that run on them.

The role's relationship to AI
Uses AI60.5% 12,762
Builds it21.7% 4,585
Governs it4.5% 953
Not stated13.2% 2,784

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · roles advertised in Q3 that involve AI · all markets · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

02 · Decisions

The decisions about the model are the part of the role most often left unwritten.

The four tests read whether a specification sets out how the person works with the model, who can overrule it, who is accountable for what it produces, and which decisions stay with the person.

9.2% of AI-central roles advertised in Q3 name who can overrule the model, the lowest of the four tests. 22.9% state which decisions the person holds.

Of AI-central roles advertised in Q3, all markets · governed view · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

verellax.skillsSkills Index. What the market hires for.

Employers ask for AI tool use in 14,432 live specifications and AI governance in 3,856.

Live specifications carrying each layer
Execution100.0%
Coordination99.3%
Judgement94.2%
AI-adjacent32.1%

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · live specs · presence, cross-sectional · mapping coverage per layer, never blended: Execution 32.0%, Coordination 57.8%, Judgement 36.2%, AI-adjacent 26.4% · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

A stated skill is what the employer asks for, never proficiency. Skills figures are composition, never trends, until coverage is flat.

The Skills Index

Markets and sectors

Roles advertised in Q3 that involve AI, by market
All markets36.9% n 57,134
Ireland42.8% n 849
US42.0% n 33,871
Canada40.7% n 1,503
UK32.2% n 7,507
Singapore31.3% n 1,085
Australia21.3% n 8,124
New Zealand12.4% n 591
Other markets36.7% n 3,604

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · roles advertised in Q3 · each market on its own base · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

Sorted from highest to lowest. Other markets holds only what the employers we track advertise in other countries. It is never a read of hiring in those countries. Markets are told apart by label, never by colour.

Roles advertised in Q3 that involve AI, by sector
All sectors36.9% n 57,134
AI-native69.5% n 2,918
Technology53.4% n 11,750
Financial services36.3% n 20,209
Professional services32.4% n 6,065
Media and entertainment31.1% n 3,329
Advertising agencies24.0% n 7,374
Consumer brands14.8% n 2,217
Retail11.4% n 1,714

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · roles advertised in Q3 · each sector on its own base · all markets · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

Sorted from highest to lowest. A translucent bar is a sector below 10 companies, n disclosed.

By market · roles advertised in Q3 · a market is named above 150 roles, 10 employers, and 30 AI-central roles · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze
MarketAdvertised in Q3EmployersInvolvedCentralAccountable
All markets57,13428436.9%60.0%20.4%
Ireland8494442.8%60.6%25.0%
US33,87117842.0%61.2%20.9%
Canada1,5038640.7%66.6%16.0%
UK7,50716532.2%57.7%23.1%
Singapore1,0856731.3%57.4%24 of 195
Australia8,12416521.3%53.7%20.7%
New Zealand5914312.4%53.4%9 of 39

Cross-market comparisons are sector-matched. A cell below its floor renders translucent with its count, never suppressed and never headlined.

By sector · roles advertised in Q3, all markets · a sector publishes at 10 or more companies · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze
SectorCompaniesInvolvedCentralAccountable
All sectors28436.9%60.0%20.4%
AI-native1669.5%65.1%19.4%
Technology6853.4%60.1%15.9%
Financial services6636.3%62.8%27.4%
Professional services2132.4%55.9%15.3%
Media and entertainment2731.1%63.4%19.6%
Advertising agencies3324.0%47.7%12.3%
Consumer brands2914.8%60.2%16.7%
Retail2311.4%52.6%17 of 103

A sector below 10 companies at the freeze renders translucent with its count.

Method

Verellax does not survey anyone. Every figure is read from what an organisation has already published and carries its date, and every projection names the measures it is built on.

Edition One prints on all collected specs, posting-date basis: roles advertised in Q3: posted 1 July to 30 September 2026, or, where the ad carries no date, first collected in that window, on a complete corpus for each named market. Every all-markets figure carries its coverage beside it, 39.3% of captured Q3 postings extracted. Every test figure reads the governed view. Under 30 roles, counts only; from 30 to 149, the share with its count; from 150, the share. Weekly figures elsewhere on the site stay on live specs.

The method reads roles as written, not what happens after the hire, and absence from a specification is not absence from the organisation.

The full method

How do I cite this edition?

Cite the edition and the date it was frozen. Exhibits may be reproduced in editorial coverage, in full and unaltered, with attribution, under the Verellax press grant. Corrections append below as dated notes.

Verellax press grant · editorial use · not CC BY 4.0 · the press kit

Send a correction

Verellax Index, Edition One, Q3 2026. Verellax workforce intelligence, 57,134 specifications advertised in Q3, 284 employers, all markets, as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze. verellax.com/index/edition-one

Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 57,134 specifications advertised in Q3 · Q3 2026 · as at 2 October 2026, Edition One freeze

Edition One, as a PDF.

Leave a work email and Edition One opens at once, with a copy to your inbox.

  • Every exhibit, numbered, each base disclosed
  • The distribution page: where do you sit
  • Appendix: the four tests, the suppression floor, the corrections route
  • No employer is named in Edition One.

Nothing else is sent unless you tick the second box. Privacy

Edition Two: January 2027. It may name companies, in the positive, above the floor, after fourteen days' notice.

The edition renders from one pinned pack. Corrections append below as dated notes, with the query shown.