Skip to content
Verellax
as at 14 September 2026 · live basis · floor 150 for a page, 50 for a cell
Live specifications15,194128 employers · as at 14 September 2026
AI-central24.7%3,748 of 15,194 · live basis
No decision architecture59.3%2,224 of 3,748 AI-central
Execution load47.8%average share of the work a model absorbs first
The caveat that travels with every figure

Where a cell falls under 50 specifications the share is held and counts print beside shares. AI-central share moves with sector mix; the sector cell is named beside every share.

How many United States specifications mention AI

3,748 of 15,194, 24.7%. Technology is the largest United States cell at 5,627 live specifications, more than Australia's entire live count; financial services 4,120; advertising and agencies 2,064. The United States share is a technology share before it is a national one. The comparison page states this beside every United States figure.

Which United States sectors write AI into roles

Technology, financial services, and advertising and agencies are the three largest United States cells, at 5,627, 4,120 and 2,064 of 15,194 live specifications. Three sectors make up most of the base, which is the sector-mix caveat made concrete.

United States live specifications by sector
15,194 live · three largest cells · live basis
Technology
5,627
Financial services
4,120
Advertising and agencies
2,064
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 15,194 United States live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026

How AI centrality changes by seniority in the United States

Entry level: 46 of 891 (5.2%). Director: 307 of 1,177 (26.1%). The United States director cell is the largest in the corpus and carries the highest AI share of any market that clears the floor. The entry-level share is five times Australia's on a base of similar size.

AI-central share, entry level against director and above
United States · cells under 50 print as counts · live basis
Entry level
5.2% · 46 of 891
Director
26.1% · 307 of 1,177
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 15,194 United States live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026

How many United States AI roles define who overrules the model

Of 3,748 AI-central specifications, 2,224 have no decision architecture, 59.3%. The largest AI-central cell in the corpus, and the share sits within two points of the United Kingdom.

How the United States compares with the United Kingdom and Australia

Execution 47.8%, coordination 24.6%, judgement 21.6%: the United States layer mix is closest to Australia's, not the United Kingdom's, despite adopting at twice Australia's rate. New roles are 10.0% of the United States base against 10.7% in the United Kingdom and 8.4% in Australia.

How the work divides across the layers
United States against the United Kingdom and Australia · average share of each role's work · live basis
United States
47.8%
24.6%
21.6%
6.0%
United Kingdom
44.5%
25.7%
23.0%
6.8%
Australia
48.1%
25.1%
22.0%
4.8%
ExecutionCoordinationJudgementAI-adjacent
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 15,194 United States · 2,795 United Kingdom · 3,240 Australia live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026

How this is measured

Live basis. Functions: engineering 4,851, operations 3,615, sales 2,322.

Full method
Related pages
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 15,194 United States live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026
Figures re-render each Monday from that week's pack. The Index re-answers the question each quarter.