Skip to content
Verellax

The United Kingdom hires for the least execution of any major market and writes AI into roles at nearly twice the Australian rate.

The governance comparator: the market whose sector mix is closest to Australia's and whose result is furthest from it.

Across 2,795 live United Kingdom specifications from 109 employers, as at 14 September 2026.

as at 14 September 2026 · live basis · floor 150 for a page, 50 for a cell
Live specifications2,795109 employers · as at 14 September 2026
AI-central27.0%755 of 2,795 · live basis
No decision architecture46.0%347 of 755 AI-central
Execution load44.5%average share of the work a model absorbs first
The caveat that travels with every figure

Where a cell falls under 50 specifications the share is held and counts print beside shares. AI-central share moves with sector mix; the sector cell is named beside every share.

How many United Kingdom specifications mention AI

755 of 2,795, 27.0%. Sector mix: financial services 1,089, advertising and agencies 773, technology 540. The three cells are near-equal, and none is AI-native, so the United Kingdom share is the least composition-driven of the high-adoption markets.

Which United Kingdom sectors write AI into roles

Financial services is the largest United Kingdom cell at 1,089 of 2,795 live specifications, and it writes the oversight-language pattern seen in Australia. Agencies are second at 773, which is where the agency mirror finding (the seller is not ahead of the buyer) is best tested.

United Kingdom live specifications by sector
2,795 live · three largest cells · live basis
Financial services
1,089
Advertising and agencies
773
Technology
540
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 2,795 United Kingdom live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026

How AI centrality changes by seniority in the United Kingdom

Entry level: 18 of 120 (15.0%). Director: 74 of 297 (24.9%). Only Ireland writes AI into more of its entry-level roles. Australia, on 608 entry specifications, writes it into 1.3%. The United Kingdom entry cell is small, 120, and the finding is stated with its count.

AI-central share, entry level against director and above
United Kingdom · cells under 50 print as counts · live basis
Entry level
15.0% · 18 of 120
Director
24.9% · 74 of 297
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 2,795 United Kingdom live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026

How many United Kingdom AI roles define who overrules the model

Of 755 AI-central specifications, 347 have no decision architecture, 46.0%. The United Kingdom adopts at the United States rate and governs at a slightly lower one. The financial services cell carries the most oversight language in the market and, as in Australia, most of it is documentation rather than authority.

How the United Kingdom compares with Australia and Singapore

Execution load 44.5%, the second-lowest in the corpus after Singapore's 42.9%; judgement 23.0%, second-highest after Singapore's 23.9%. New roles are 10.7% of the base, the highest of the three largest markets. The United Kingdom is redesigning more of its roles, hiring for more judgement, and writing AI in more often, and it names authority less often than Australia does.

How the work divides across the layers
United Kingdom against Australia and Singapore · average share of each role's work · live basis
United Kingdom
44.5%
25.7%
23.0%
6.8%
Australia
48.1%
25.1%
22.0%
4.8%
Singapore
42.9%
26.8%
23.9%
6.5%
ExecutionCoordinationJudgementAI-adjacent
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 2,795 United Kingdom · 3,240 Australia · 327 Singapore live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026

How this is measured

Live basis. Functions: engineering 706, operations 581, sales 478, near-equal.

Full method
Related pages
Source: Verellax workforce intelligence · 2,795 United Kingdom live specifications · live basis · as at 14 September 2026
Figures re-render each Monday from that week's pack. The Index re-answers the question each quarter.